Totalitarian regimes stay in political power through an all-encompassing propaganda disseminated through controlled mass media, a political party marked by personality cultism, control over the economy, regulation and restriction of speech, and surveillance.
Can totalitarian rule really happen in America? Even worse, has the country already begun a shift towards Totalitarianism, not unlike Nazi Germany or Chile under Pinochet? If so, how can we know these dangers have arrived, and what can we do to combat hem? These are the questions Naomi Wolf proposes to answer in, The End of America. She presents a disturbing look at recent events in America's history and predictions for a possible future in which the democracy of America is slowly eroded away and replaced with a rising Totalitarianism.
Wolf explains her motivation was the fact she could no longer ignore the anti-democratic trends occurring in numerous segments of a formerly free America. Noticing these trends caused her to research the methods dictators used in the past to close down a society, and search for similarities between various regimes. She states, "I had to reread the stories of the making and the unmaking of freedom. The more I read these histories, the more disturbed I became." The product of her research is presented a set of ten steps all dictators take when attempting to shut an open society, and the bulk of the film is spent discussing these steps and how they have been taken in the past and how they are being taken now in America.
One only has to look around at books and newspaper articles being published in America on a weekly basis for examples of the profound fear this country has moved decisively in a direction that has as its conclusion a society completely closed down to the ideas of democracy.
The one most glaring difference between past dictatorial regimes and America is the fact, according to Wolf, we will not experience a dramatic event to herald the closing of democracy. "There will not be a coup in America like Mussolini's March on Rome or a dramatic massacre like Hitler's Night of the Long Knives," that will shock the society into submission and declare martial law.
This means that the shift to fascism would necessarily take much longer, as it is enacted out in a series of progressive steps and, presumably, could be slowed, stopped, or reversed.
The 10 steps dictators (or aspiring dictators) take in order to shut down an open society.
"Each of these steps is under way in the U.S. today."
1. Invoke a terrifying internal and external threat...
People who are afraid are willing to do things they wouldn’t otherwise do.
2. Establish secret (unaccountable) prisons where torture takes place...
In a secret system, the government does not have to provide any proof of wrongdoing by those it holds, so it can incarcerate anyone it wants.
3. Develop a thug caste... a paramilitary force...
A private military force, under the exclusive direction of the “commander in chief” with no accountability to Congress, the courts, or the public, blurs the line between a civilian police force and a militarized police state.
4. Set up an internal surveillance system... surveil ordinary citizens...
People who believe they are being watched are less likely to voice opposition. To scare a population into silence, the government need only monitor the activities of a few to make everyone fear that they are being surveilled. Every closed society keeps a “list” of so-called opponents it tracks.
5. Harass and infiltrate citizen’s groups...
Spies in activist groups put psychological pressure on genuine activists by undermining their trust in one another. They may also disrupt legal activities, undermining the effectiveness of group efforts.
6. Engage in arbitrary detention and release of ordinary citizens...
Detention intimidates or psychologically damages those arrested and also lets everyone know that anyone could be labeled an “enemy combatant” and “disappeared.”
7. Target key individuals...
People are less likely to speak out when those who are highly visible, like journalists, scholars, artists, or celebrities, are intimidated or have the livelihoods threatened. Targeting those who are especially visible makes it less likely that people will speak out and robs society of leaders and others who might inspire opposition.
8. Control and restrict the press...
The public is less likely to find out about government wrongdoing if the government can someway threaten anyone who publishes or broadcasts reports critical of the government.
9. Recast criticism as espionage and dissent as treason...
People who protest can be charged with terrorism or treason when laws criminalize or limit free speech rather than protect it.
10. Subvert and suspend the rule of law...
The disappearance of checks and balances makes it easier to declare martial law, especially if the judiciary branch continues to exercise authority over individuals but has no authority over the Executive branch.
As noted above, the vast majority of the film deals with the similarities between the current state of America in relation to these steps and various dictatorial regimes in the past. Many of the comparisons Wolf draws are timely and disturbing, especially as some of the very same tactics used by dictators in the past were described with the very same terms as are now being used ("war footing," the use of embedded journalists in the Iraq War). Also disturbing is the brazen way that the Bush administration took these steps in the open. Although the government has been involved in surveilling citizens (wiretapping during Watergate ), infiltrating citizen's groups (the FBI's COINTELPRO ), and developing a paramilitary force outside the control of Congress (the CIA), these were often secretive acts that were not meant to have light shed on them and were claimed to be stopped after being discovered.
Now, however, the government has either admitted openly to these acts, or simply lied about them in the face of evidence to the contrary; no efforts are made to discover the truth or protect citizens' rights. In fact, more of then ten steps are taken in response to the uncovering of other steps being taken, including suing and imprisoning journalists, labeling dissent as anti-American, and invoking the threat of terrorist strikes against the nation.
This is the difference that Wolf is concerned with in regards to the open shift in America towards the complete subversion of the rule of law. Formerly secret activities citizens would have voiced strident objections to are now committed in the open, with no regard to public opinion.
Another disturbing similarity Wolf points to is the progressive desensitization that occurs when a shift to Totalitarianism happens over time, instead of through sudden violence. The secret prisons and use of torture may originally be used only on suspected terrorists or "enemy combatants," who are plotting attacks against the nation. However, as the public gets over its aversion to torture, the definition of who is an "enemy combatant" or similarly hurting the nation becomes broader. In short order, those who expose government lies and corruption in the press are decided to be undermining the government and need to be imprisoned and tortured. Then, ordinary citizens who speak out against government policies may become subject to arbitrary detention or prolonged imprisonment.
It is in the end talking about "The Patriot's Task," that Wolf provides some final messages of hope that the country's moves towards the closing down of democracy can be reversed. Solutions are also presented, including the need to "hold house parties, set up town halls, convene our neighbors, pass out users' guides to the Constitution, overwhelm our representatives and the Presidential candidates with demands for them to restore the rule of law," as well as "stand up directly to confront those who have committed crimes against the Constitution, and hold them accountable."
As the crimes against the Constitution have been numerous, and accountability has been lacking, it is uncertain how practical these suggestions may be, but neighbors and communities can come together over their disillusionment with the current state of American politics.
In this way, community solutions can be established, including ways to take power back from the government, such as establishing local currencies, making investments in local businesses instead of large corporations that receive huge government contracts and tax breaks, and sustainable methods of keeping small localities open and democratic. Even as citizens work towards reopening the government (a goal whose achievement is doubtful), they can disengage from these same establishments until they are reopened or recreated, and engage in the more productive work of creating sustainable solutions.
It's an important little film.. all Americans should watch it and be made aware of the potential for the worst that could happen.
*************************
Netflix: The End of America

